The Ted K Archive
  • Table of Contents
  • Archive
    • Titles
    • Collections
    • Authors
    • Topics
    • Latest entries
    • Popular Texts
    • Add a new text
  • More
    • About this project
    • Contact
    • How to find and use the archive
    • How to Improve This Project
    • Wishlist of Texts
    • Controversially Published & Deleted Texts
    • Live chat on Discord
    • Live chat on Matrix
    • Discuss on Reddit
    • Discuss on Twitter
  • Related projects
    • Anarchist Libraries .net
    • The Anarchist Library
    • Steal This Wiki
    • The Library of Unconventional Lives
    • Sprout Distro
    • Earth First!
    • Food not Bombs
    • Radical Routes
    • Squat.net
    • Industrial Workers of the World
    • Kurdish Solidarity Network
  • Bookbuilder
  • Mobile applications
  • RSS feed
  • Random
  • Add a new text

Add sections to the bookbuilder: Memorandum from Bob to Doug regarding Kaczynski's Petition for Re-Hearing

 

With complex structures, e.g., a chapter with subsections, selecting only the chapter is likely to select only the chapter's title, so probably you want to select the chapter and all its subsections.

The text structure is shown below.

 
Section
Select
Title, author, date...
Memorandum from Bob to Doug regarding Kaczynski's Petition for Re-Hearing
I. The Claim: Self-Representation Request Cannot Be Denied on the Grounds of Purpose to Delay Without Showing There Would be an Actual Delay (pp. 6-9)
II. The Claim: the District Court Must Conduct an Adequate Inquiry in Order to Find Purpose to Delay (pp. 9-10)
III. The Claim: Kaczynski Could Have Assumed His Defense Immediately; the Fact That it Would Have Been an Inadequate Defense Is Irrelevant Because Kaczynski Was Not Required to Present Any Defense at All (pp. 10-13)
IV. The Claim: Postponing Self-representation Request until All Other Reasonable Avenues Have Been Exhausted Is Not a Tactic for Delay (pp. 14-17)
V. The Claim: the Panel Should Not Be Limited to “The Record and Files” to Show That the Purpose of Delay Finding Was Clearly Erroneous; the Panel Should Be Allowed to Rely Upon the 2255 Petition (pp. 17-19)
Source, notes...
 
 
 
 
Random | RSS feed | Titles | Authors | Topics | Latest entries | Mobile | Add a new text